Longitudinal assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma response to stereotactic body radiation using gadoxetate-enhanced MRI: A case series.

PURPOSE: To describe the longitudinal response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and who underwent liver transplant (LT) using gadoxetate-enhanced MRI. METHODS: Five men (median age 61y, range 57-64y) with 6 HCCs treated with SBRT (median dose 50 Gy) who subsequently underwent LT were included in this retrospective study. Patients underwent gadoxetate-enhanced MRI before and after SBRT over a period of 3-18 months. Response was assessed using RECIST1.1, mRECIST, LI-RADS and image subtraction, by 2 observers in consensus. Percentage of pathologic tumor necrosis was evaluated. RESULTS: LT was performed 278 days (IQR, 148-418d) after completion of SBRT and 48d after the last MRI. Histopathology demonstrated tumor necrosis of 48 ± 42% (range, 10-100%). Mean tumor size at baseline and last post-treatment MRIs pre-LT were 2.6 ± 0.8 cm and 2.4 ± 0.9 cm. Enhancing tumor component size at baseline MRI and last post-treatment MRI pre-LT were 1.6 ± 0.8 cm and 0.9 ± 1.0 cm. Responses assessed at the last LRI pre-LT were: partial response (PR, n = 3), stable disease (SD, n = 3) using RECIST1.1; complete response (CR, n = 2), partial response (PR, n = 2), stable disease (SD, n = 2) using mRECIST; and LR-TR viable (n = 4), LR-TR non-viable (n = 2) using LI-RADS. At the last MRI pre-LT, per-lesion features of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE, 4/6), portal venous washout (3/6) and capsule (3/6) were observed. 5/6 lesions displayed a hypointense perilesional halo on hepatobiliary phase with a mean delay of 3.1 months post-SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: This case-series showed decreased size, persistent APHE, and incomplete pathologic necrosis in most HCCs treated with SBRT undergoing transplant.

Hepatic small vessel neoplasm: not totally benign, not yet malignant.

Hepatic small vessel neoplasm (HSVN) is a rare vascular tumor with few reports in the literature. While imaging findings may show characteristic enhancement patterns, limited available literature may not reveal the full potential for image-based diagnosis. Histologically, HSVN mimics other entities, though certain morphologic and immunohistochemical findings provide clues for diagnosis. However, HSVN still provides diagnostic challenges, especially on core biopsies with limited material for morphologic and molecular evaluation. While current recommendations are surgical resection and close observation, the long-term course of the tumor is unknown. We report a case of HSVN in a liver with additional feature of organized lymphoid aggregates necessitating additional hematopathology consultation and workup to rule out concurrent entities.

Features of endoscopic procedure site reaction associated with a recently approved submucosal lifting agent.

Endoscopic resection techniques, such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), are frequently aided by injection of submucosal lifting solutions that create a plane for dissection and protect deeper mural layers. ORISE™ gel is a recently approved synthetic lifting solution that produces a localized inflammatory reaction associated with retained gel at the injection site. We describe a series of six cases of ORISE™-associated inflammatory lesions in patients who underwent endoscopic resections. Deposits comprised pale fibrillary or hyalinized eosinophilic material, depending on their age. All cases were associated with an inflammatory reaction composed of foreign-body giant cells and scattered eosinophils. ORISE™ gel extended laterally and deeply beyond residual tumors in all cases. Histochemically, the material proved to be negative for Congo Red, and mucicarmine, faint blue with Alcian blue, but positive for PAS and PAS-D. It stained blue with trichrome. Such deposits were absent in cases, wherein other widely-available lifting solutions were used. We compared ORISE™ deposits to histologically similar extracellular deposits, namely amyloid and pulse granulomata. Unlike ORISE™ material, amyloid deposits appear as waxy, more densely eosinophilic material, and stain positive with Congo Red. Amyloid demonstrated prominent intramucosal and perivascular distributions, features not seen in this series of ORISE™ deposits. Hyalinized pulse granulomata showed strong overlap with ORISE™ deposits, since they also comprise eosinophilic material associated with giant cell reaction. On the other hand, they form ribbons of glassy material in circumscribed lobules, unlike the ill-defined ORISE™ deposits. In summary, we describe the pathologic findings at injection sites in patients who underwent endoscopic procedures aided by the recently approved lifting agent, ORISE™. Pathologists should be aware of its appearance and associated reaction to avoid confusion with other common extracellular deposits seen in the gastrointestinal tract.